tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11708271.post615326987833742839..comments2024-03-27T15:17:46.632+08:00Comments on HanWorks Research: Creating a Panorama using Autostitchminghanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03994451733321468155noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11708271.post-61883280108764978712010-01-02T03:55:21.718+08:002010-01-02T03:55:21.718+08:00ut it has a major disadvantage: the memory consump...ut it has a major disadvantage: the memory consumption compared to other stitchers.<br /><br />5 photos (4592x2056) can be stitched together to a pano with max 2500px height using 2GB Ram on my machine here.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11708271.post-69306233977150175362008-10-20T00:45:00.000+08:002008-10-20T00:45:00.000+08:00Yes, WLPG also offers the same feature & the c...Yes, WLPG also offers the same feature & the creator of Autostitch has joined Microsoft now so one would assume that WLPG is a better version. However image results are varying & in some cases Autostitch ends up performing better than WLPG. This is probably because WLPG does not offer the controls that Autostitch does which might be a reason for 'expert users' to stick to Autostitch.<BR/><BR/>Nevertheless if someone finds Autostich interface to be intimidating, simply use WLPG.sprabshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04435821227322245171noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11708271.post-78161556037952019152007-12-23T01:28:00.000+08:002007-12-23T01:28:00.000+08:00Or use Windows Live Photo Gallery - download from ...Or use Windows Live Photo Gallery - download from <A HREF="http://get.live.com" REL="nofollow">http://get.live.com</A>. It uses an <A HREF="http://hdview.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!1AD33AA162CE96C2!506.entry" REL="nofollow">improved version</A> of the technology used by Autotitch.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com